Welcome back to the British Genre Fiction Focus, Tor.com’s regular round-up of book news from the United Kingdom’s thriving speculative fiction industry.
In this, the last edition of the British Genre Fiction Focus before the column goes on hiatus over the holidays—more on which in a moment—we’ve got some pretty Patrick Rothfuss cover art, a round-up of some of the conversations to come from the UK’s first Young Adult Literature Convention, and an argument that the modern novel may be “losing the narrative arms race.”
All that, plus the Waterstones Children’s Laureate comes over all Klingon, author Allan Ahlberg takes a stand against Amazon, the first male Queen of Teen is crowned, and more.
A Holiday Hiatus
I don’t know about you, but I’m pooped. It’s been a pleasure and a privilege to curate the news for you fine folks, but I haven’t, if I’m honest, had the chance to do much of anything else since the launch of the British Genre Fiction Focus (not to speak of the Short Fiction Spotlight) some seventy-five weeks or so ago.
And behind the scenes of the stories you read each week, there’s been drama, I dare say. Dreaded disinterest! And ill health, as well. Most weeks I’ve managed to come up with a column in any event. I’ve occupied internet cafes in the highlands and islands; I’ve blogged from the hospital; I’ve covered cover art with a heavy heart.
The long and short of all this is, I’m taking a bit of a break. A holiday, you could call it. So though the news never stops, the British Genre Fiction Focus will. But just for a bit. I’ll be back at it sometime in September, and I look forward to talking to you all again then—assuming the novel form lasts that long, as Damien Walter wonders.
The Fall of the Novel
The Sopranos. Mad Men. Band of Brothers. House of Cards. Game of Thrones. […] True Detective. Individually the best shows in the HBO format (there are now other producers) are the equal of any stories ever told. And in many regards, better. Taken as a whole, there is a strong argument that they are part of the most amazing flourishing of story in human history. They combine the complexity of novels with the spectacle [of] film. And they bring another element almost unique to television. They are written collaboratively by teams of writers and script editors. These shows aren’t just the product of one superb imagination, but many of them, working in unison.
The novel, having pioneered the complex high quality storytelling it is clear audiences hunger for, now struggles to match the best of that storytelling in other mediums. Novels can’t touch the spectacle of film or the new king of that hill, video games. And they’re outgunned in the sheer richness of storytelling the best television shows can achieve. Not because the novel can’t match that quality, of course it can, but because doing so is very difficult. And the number of writers capable of producing stories of that quality is very small.
Quite despite myself, I tend to agree with Walter here. There’s been a lot of complex and compelling television of late. How many books have inspired a fraction of the widespread fervour Breaking Bad or True Detective did? My two pence: not a great many.
Which isn’t to say publishers haven’t given it a go. In fact:
For the best part of a decade now publishers have been flooding their distribution channels with fantasy series in the style of Game of Thrones. But instead of seeking out the few writers who might have the chops to make a new work on the scale of Martin’s epic, publishers have paid peanuts to debut authors to make third rate clones that lack all the technical expertise to equal the original. And this is far from a unique scenario. The publishing industry, instead of nurturing quality writing, has turned itself in to a cloning operation. There are still quality books to be found of course, but they are buried amongst a swill of third rate clones of the rare bestsellers that appear. And this, more than anything else, is destroying the audience for novels. Imagine if HBO, alongside True Detective, also released 200 competing television shows that looked similar but nowhere near as good. They would quickly undermine their audience engagement, just as publishers have. If publishers want their business back, they need to be as obsessed with story quality as HBO.
It’s worth noting that a number of the projects Walter points to have their origins in the literary tradition. The first season of True Detective was deeply indebted to dark fantasy—to Thomas Ligotti and the like. Game of Thrones is obviously based on George R. R. Martin’s novels. House of Cards was adapted from a British miniseries in turn adapted from a novel written by Michael Dobbs. Consider also The Wire, and Hannibal. Both shows began because of books. I could go on.
But what’s the point? Walter of the Weird Things doesn’t dispute that the novel can be as brilliant as the best television. His point is it’s far harder, because it takes an entire talented team to make a terrific TV series, whereas books are produced—in this day and age, anyway—by individuals:
The writers who achieve real quality in their work do so entirely under their own energies. And that small minority of writers are now turning to self-publishing as an answer to the serious question, what value are publishers adding if they do not nurture quality? Because, if novels are to thrive as a medium in the 21st century, it is only an obsession with quality that will place them among the best storytelling on offer.
Quality, not quantity? You what?
As self-evident as that statement seems, I’d suggest that some publishers would be wise to take Walter’s words to heart.
Cover Art Corner: The Slow Regard of Silent Things
Last week, Gollancz unveiled what must be one of the year’s loveliest covers, for The Slow Regard of Silent Things by Patrick Rothfuss.
Haunting, huh?
Note that The Slow Regard of Silent Things is not book three of The Kingkiller Chronicles. “It’s not a mammoth tome that you can use to threaten people and hold open doors,” the author allows. Instead, “it’s a short, sweet story about one of my favourite characters.”
Who could that be? Well, if you weren’t already aware:
The University, a renowned bastion of knowledge, attracts the brightest minds to unravel the mysteries of enlightened sciences like artificing and alchemy. Yet deep below its bustling halls lies a complex and cavernous maze of abandoned rooms and ancient passageways—and in the heart of it all lives Auri.
Formerly a student at the University, now Auri spends her days tending the world around her. She has learned that some mysteries are best left settled and safe. No longer fooled by the sharp rationality so treasured by the University, Auri sees beyond the surface of things, into subtle dangers and hidden names.
At once joyous and haunting, The Slow Regard of Silent Things is a rich, atmospheric and lyrical tale, featuring one of the most beloved characters from Rothfuss’ acclaimed fantasy series.
It’s out at the end of October, folks.
Odds and Sods
- To celebrate the early September publication of his new novel, The Bone Clocks, Man Booker Prize winner David Mitchell has taken to the “diabolical treble-strapped textual straitjacket” of Twitter to tell a tall tale set in the same universe as said. ‘The Right Sort’ will run to 280 tweets and take a week to complete. Helpfully, The Guardian has been collating the author’s tweets here.
- “The world’s most democratic literary award,” namely the Not the Booker Prize, is now accepting nominations. Fittingly, given the actual Man Booker’s latest about-face, the Not the Booker is now open to all English language authors, up to and including Americans. You’ve got till July 27 to get some speculative fiction in, in any event.
- Children’s Laureate Malorie Blackman, who welcomed attendees of the UK’s first Young Adult Literature Convention dressed in a Star Trek outfit on Saturday, has said that though there are “dogs, cats, rabbits [and] puppies” aplenty, “there are not enough characters from ethnic minorities in children’s picture books.”
- In the interim, a bunch of other interesting debates have taken place at the Earl’s Court con. Author Isabel Harrop thinks that “the Young Adult field is ‘one of the best places to be a woman in the media,’” whereas Sarah Manning disagreed, whilst an entire panel of pundits admitted that they felt a “duty to write about sex in YA as it reflects the reality of life for teenagers.”
- Fending off competition from eight other authors, including Cassandra Clare, Veronica Roth and John Green, James Dawson, the writer of Hollow Pike, has been crowned Queen of Teen at a ceremony in Surrey. He’s the first fella to be acknowledged by acknowledged by the body behind the award, which was set up in 2008 to encourage teen girls to read.
- Angry Robot was “already set for a bumper evening with Anne Lyle, Mike Shevdon, Adam Christopher, Wesley Chu and Madeline Ashby at Forbidden Planet on Wednesday 13 August,” then they announced that this year’s Prometheus Award winner Ramez Naam would be coming to town too.
- At a debate at the House of Commons last week, The Gospel of Loki author Joanne Harris spoke about the value of art and the perceived mystique of the writing life. “Understand that we have children and mortgages, and that writing is a real job that real people do,” she reminded an audience of industry insiders.
- He may have his hands full battling the blasted embuggerance, but ahead of the autumn release of Terry Pratchett’s next collection, Dragons at Crumbling Castle, Random House plan to publish a digital edition of his short story ‘The Abominable Snowman.
- Children’s author Allan Ahlberg has knocked back “the inaugural Booktrust Best Book Awards’ Lifetime Achievement Award, because it is sponsored by Amazon.” He explained his reasons in this letter to The Bookseller. Short answer: tax. “A good thing,” he begins. “It pays for schools, hospitals—libraries! When companies like Amazon cheat—paying 0.1% on billions, pretending it is earning money not in the UK, but in Luxembourg—that’s a bad thing.”
That’s it from me for this week, readers—and indeed, for the Focus for a few months. See you all on the other side of the summer!
Niall Alexander is an extra-curricular English teacher who reads and writes about all things weird and wonderful for The Speculative Scotsman, Strange Horizons, and Tor.com. He’s been known to tweet, twoo.
The girl with the purple hair in the front row of that picture looks fabulous :) (I used to have purple hair…still love it).
I had no idea Patrick Rothfuss was working on a new book, I was thinking the cover art might be about the third book. Very excited :)
I actually still prefer reading to TV, but I do think some interesting points are made there. I have definitely had to be a bit more selective in what I choose to read becuase there are so many books, so little time.
That bit about the fall of novels turns me instantly defensive. Upon reflection, I have to admit that I love good film and television. As much as I love good acting, cinematography, and writing, though, it still disengages my imagination. I’ve heard people refer to that aspect of reading as ‘work,’ but it’s only ever been part of the pleasure for me.
Then there’s my issue that’s illustrated by Game of Thrones. As much fun as that show is, I miss the time spent with each of the characters in the books. Good adaptations can be iconic, like in Blade Runner (though I’m positive there are those who think it’s a bad one), but I’d much rather see more original work on film and television than the seemingly endless supply of adaptations and reboots.
Regardless, I’ll still enjoy all these forms of entertainment, I’ll just lament losses for the written forms. Not that a win for one form means a loss for the others.
Have fun on your vacation Niall. I think that there will still be novels when you return.
@stevenhalter: Tell you what, I’ve got my fingers crossed! It may be that they’re a dying breed, but I’m a fan of novels, and I ain’t ashamed to say it.
@@.-@: I’m not sure I can agree with Walter: certainly, I would like to see publisher attempt something that isn’t “THE NEXT GAME OF THRONES!” but isn’t he just comparing the best of one medium with the low-grade average of another? I could equally say that television is in a slump: sure, there’s occasional hits but most of it is faux-reality sludge, not a patch on The Adjacent or The Quantum Thief…
Anyway, a David Mitchell story! I’ll catch up with it when he’s finished. Enjoy your (well-earned) holiday.
I have no worries about the future of the novel (and prose fiction in general).
Books that generate the fervor of Breaking Bad, et al? Well, the Game of Thrones series, Robert Jordan/Brandon Sanderson’s Wheel of Time, lots of buzz for Stephen King’s Shining sequel Dr. Sleep, 50 Shades of Stupid…er, Gray, the Harry Potter books.
Film, video games, television and comics all tell amazing and wonderful stories in different ways. Prose fiction is an amazing way to tell stories as well, allowing the reader to immerse themselves in the story and at the same time imagine the details in a way that other media do not allow.
I personally prefer reading to most other media because reading fiction just feels “more real” — I can get inside the characters’ heads, feel what it is like to live and be in that world rather than just being shown with no room to fill in the details.
As for traditional publishing printing too much derivative material — true, but also true of other media. (How many clones of anything popular do you see in TV, film, video games and comics?). Trad pub is generally speaking, driven by herd impulses — let’s focus on what’s already popular and do more of that. But that is true of almost any media — music, film, TV, comics, etc.
The one great advantage of publishing is that it is a relatively inexpensive medium to play in — making film, TV and video game projects all require dozens to hundreds of people collaborating and million dollar budgets. Traditional comics are less expensive (smaller creative team) but you have the costs of printing and distribution unless you go digital only.
A single author can have an idea and write a book on his own without having to convince or pay other people to help him. His only cost is living expenses, hiring a cover artist, hiring an editor if he does not self-edit, beta readers (who often read and contribute at no charge) and a formatter (if he is not doing it himself — many authors do their own formatting).
Ebook publishing is free and an author can make print copies available through CreateSpace.com at no cost to himself and a modest cost to readers.
So an author can write a novel and be much more experimental than the flashier, more expensive media. With self-publishing, he can go directly to distributors and readers…it is a creative medium where authors are free to do whatever they want and share it with the world with a minimum of obstacles.
A bit of British genre news: the last issue of Subterranean Online includes a story by Alastair Reynolds, “The Last Log of the Lachrimosa”. Newsworthy, I think, because it’s the first Revelation Space story since “Monkey Suit”, back in 2009. Here’s the link (broken into two lines): http://subterraneanpress.com/magazine/summer_2014/
the_last_log_of_the_lachrimosa_by_alastair_reynolds
A long Strange Horizons post on the current state of British SFF: http://www.strangehorizons.com/2014/20140728/1britsf-a.shtml.
Chris Beckett reports that Mother of Eden will now be published in Spring 2015 in both the UK and US. Apparently, it has “been through quite a metamorphosis” since the Gela’s Ring publication.
@Schuyler H: So I finally found the time to read through the Strange Horizons post on science fiction in Britain. Too much to say about it to contain in a single comment, but thanks a thousand time for pointing the piece out. If I ruled the world, ignorance of the points raised in this article would be illegal.
Does anyone have any idea why Subterranean Online is shutting up shop? I was so sad to see that the new edition was its final issue; feels like it’s been a bastion of brilliant genre fiction for forever…
@10: Sadly Niall, paying authors top rates for high-quality stories which are, effectively, being given away did not prove to be a substainable long-term business strategy. Will there be an analysis of the Strange Horizons post when you get back?
The problem with ongoing, serialized TV shows as opposed to a novel is simple… you can’t go back and edit the TV show. I have RARELY found the best of these TV shows (which I love) to be as well plotted and well paced as the most average novel… and it should be obvious why. TV shows are on a tight, tight deadline and once material is shot and edited… its out there, regardless of the ramifications it might have on the story next season… whereas when an author finishes a first draft, writes through to the end, he can then go back and adjust pacing, plotting, fill holes and gaps, make sure things make sense from a continuity point of view, seed red herrings and hints and foreshadowing, etc… The TV writers have to do this (using GROUPTHINK, no less) without the benefit of being able to change thier minds and rewrite it.
The table of contents for the Ian Whates anthology Paradox: Stories Inspired by the Fermi Paradox is out. Includes new stories by Adam Roberts, Tricia Sullivan, Paul Cornell and more: http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2014/08/table-of-contents-paradox-stories-inspired-by-the-fermi-paradox-edited-by-ian-whates/
M. John Harrison’s upcoming collection may (or may not) contain a new Viriconium story: http://ambientehotel.wordpress/2014/08/27/sffweird-at-warwick-u/
The Man Booker longlist has been whittled down to a shortlist but We Are All Completely Beside Ourselves and J remain in the running.